Self contradictory

I dont understand the need to present this as "balanced"and "skeptical" both at the same time, even within the same sentence. Its okay to have an opposing point of view. Its wonderful that you guys are skeptical, but this is clearly not a balanced argument, so why present it as such? Make up your mind. You cant claim to present both sides of the issue and then go on to cherry pick evidence supporting one side while misrepresenting the evidence supporting the other. Thats simply dishonest.

This is an app put out by climate change deniers. Dont let these guys kid you. If thats what you want thats fine, enjoy. It focuses primarily on three issues. That hundreds of millions of years ago there was abundant CO2 in the atmosphere, (without mentioning the lower solar output negating any greenhouse effect). Also, that climate changes naturally over time, which indeed it does, (which doesnt mean humans dont affect the climate also). And, that the last decade has been cooler not warmer, (which it hasnt. [NASA, NOAA])

Byte-Me about Our Climate, v1.0.1